Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Arcola School - 2019 Update

The 1939 Arcola School - 2019.

Along with visiting the Sterling Annex School recently, I checked up on the 1939 Arcola School. There hasn't been any news articles about since the last time I checked on it. Everything seems to remain in fairly good condition.

The grass is still mown regularly. Most of the eaves look to be in very good condition. There are some sections that have wood rot (caused from a now-removed gutter downspout) and flaking paint. Just a couple of signs of decay. The roof looks fine. All the windows are covered and the school is locked up tight from intruders or Mother Nature.

Front of Arcola School

Looking to the right of the entrance. 

There is only one area that visually reflects its abandonment -- the northern side. A fenced-off area is full of overgrown plants. Ivy climbs along the building's eave. Other than the fence being there, I don't understand why this area has been allowed to grow like this. [This area was also present when I visited in 2017].

Arcola School along its northern side.

Behind the school, the grounds' conditions range from excellent to needs some work.

Grass is starting to grow in the cracks in the pavement at the tennis court. Still usable though.

Arcola Tennis Court

The basketball court has a pile of mulch sitting on one half of the asphalt. It would be fun to shoot baskets from the top of it.

Arcola Basketball Court

 The playground is starting to get grassy. Still could play on it.

Arcola Playground

The baseball field - excellent condition. It looks regularly taken care of and used. Batter up!

Arcola Baseball Field

There was also a wooden pavilion and soccer field. The pavilion looked surrounded by high grass-- might rethink planning a picnic there. Soccer field looked alright, nothing too memorable to photograph though.


Read other Arcola School Posts:
The Three Schools of Arcola (2011)
Arcola School - 2017 Update

Thursday, June 6, 2019

Sterling Community Center Annex - 2019 Update

Sterling Annex - 2019

[Update August 2023: This school has now been demolished. Check out Sterling Annex DEMO DAY 1]

Back in Sterling for a fun-filled trip to the slowly decaying Sterling Community Center Annex! Not much has changed this year. The boards covering the windows have aged and faded. The grass still has evidence of being mown periodically.

Sterling Annex Front Door

The front column that fell off last year is gone. Hopefully, it's inside the building, rather than stolen. Both boards covering the front doors are new, but one is painted white for some reason.

Flooded stairs to the basement

The stairs to the basement continue to be flooded.

One side of the backside

The other side of the backside

My favorite door

My favorite door still looks the same.

Opening to the roof above a side door. Look at that wood!



Over at the identical door on the other side, there is an opening to the roof.

Baseball field shot

Time out, I haven't written about the baseball field ever! It has been overtaken by grass. There are no bases to be found anywhere. Beyond center field, the far corner was converted to a gravel parking lot area sometime between 2016-17.

All in all, it's a very similar experience with last year's report. Belfort opened their new showroom last November, with no announcements on future use of the Sterling property.

I did discover a group called Save Old Sterling that is involved in the preservation of the original Sterling area. While its focus might be on older structures, if you are interested in preserving the Sterling area in general, this would be a great place to start.

That's all I got this year folks.

Front of Sterling Annex

Sources:
Belfort Furniture to unveil new 85,000-square-foot showroom with celebrity guests


Read all Sterling Annex Posts:
Sterling Community Center Annex (2012)
News on the Sterling Annex Building (2013)
Sterling Community Center Annex - 2016 Update
Sterling Community Center Annex - 2017 Update
Sterling Community Center Annex - 2018 Update

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Creating a Climate for Success: A Look Back on Loudoun County Public Schools

(At the end of my second summer interning at Loudoun County Public Schools (2012), I completed a paper overview on the school system's history. This was to help my colleagues continue work on our LCPS History film project. Recently, I was looking through some old files on my computer, and rediscovered the paper. I don't remember exactly why I never posted it here. Either I wanted this to be the final post for the blog, or I wanted to post in conjunction with the film project premiere. I present it to you now.)

Second Street School in Waterford, VA

Creating a Climate for Success:
A Look Back on Loudoun County Public Schools
By A.J. Jelonek, August 24, 2012


   Loudoun County was a quiet county at the top of Virginia in the late 19th Century. Mostly agriculturally based, the county’s population remained stable around 21,000 people. Many little towns and villages dotted the landscape.

   In 1869, Virginia’s General Assembly mandated that public education be provided for the children of the state. In the fall of 1870, the Loudoun County Public School District held its first year of classes. 55 school buildings were already in the county at the time. Three years later, another 55 schools had been built, an early example of Loudouners strong desire for education. Many of the schools were one room schoolhouses. Schools were community-based, and the school year worked around the farming schedule. As Virginia was in the South, schools were segregated between whites and blacks. The county itself was divided into six school districts: Leesburg, Mount Gilead, Mercer, Jefferson, Lovettsville, and Broad Run. Each one had its own school board and paid different tax rates for public education. The Jefferson District, for example, was so well off, it could afford to offer its students transportation via horse drawn busses in 1911.

   In the 1890’s, high school level classes were offered to white students (blacks would have to wait another 20 years). In 1909, the schools at Leesburg, Lincoln, and Waterford received the first state accreditations for four-year high schools in the county. High schools at the time started at 8th grade, so high school only went up to 11th grade. 12th grade would be added in 1945 for whites, 1949 for blacks.

   Consolidation became the name of the game. In 1916, there were 12 small regional high schools and over 60 grade schools, most still one room schoolhouses. In 1917, Oscar L. Emerick became Loudoun County’s 5th superintendent. He led a push for better education but a smaller building count. By 1922, Loudoun had one consolidated school board. Many people felt very attached to their one room schoolhouses and regional high schools and protested when the decision came to close their particular school. But change came. Closing the schools happened either politically (ordering a closure of a school due to lack of attendance to cut costs) or in a few cases naturally (fire).

   In the 30’s, while white students attended schools such as the brick Leesburg High School, African Americans had the Loudoun Training School down the road on Union Street, a wooden two story frame building built about 1884. Hazardous conditions and a lack of the school’s ability to support a curriculum equal to the white school’s prompted a push from the African American community for a new high school. The movement led to the creation of a Loudoun Branch of the N.A.A.C.P. and a County-Wide League. These groups called upon Charles H. Houston, a well-known civil rights attorney, to help them. By the end of 1940, the African-American community raised $4000 (equal to $58,600 today) and bought a land deed for a new black high school in Leesburg and presented it to the School Board. In 1941, Douglass High School opened its doors. It became the first accredited public black high school in the state of Virginia. Along with a new school, bus transportation also became available to blacks.

   In 1953, the last white one room schoolhouse, Mountain Gap by Oatlands Plantation, closed. In 1957, Second Street School in Waterford, the last black one room schoolhouse, closed its doors. At the high school level, 12 white high schools were whittled down to four regional high schools located in Aldie, Leesburg, Lincoln, and Lovettsville. The students of these schools became one with the opening of Loudoun County High School in 1954. The new consolidated high school was the first building in Loudoun County to cost over a million dollars.

   Superintendent Emerick retired in 1957, effectively marking the end of consolidation. He was superintendent for 40 years, the longest term in the county to date. Ten years later, he was honored by the school system with the opening of his namesake school in Purcellville. The next superintendent was Clarence M. Bussinger, who would lead the schools through the era of desegregation.

   Like consolidation, integration in Loudoun schools came slowly. The Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court decision declared segregation in schools was unconstitutional. Loudoun County took a wait-and-see approach. The decision did not present any immediate action, so segregation continued. The Board of Supervisors did vote that if forced to integrate, it would close the schools (a decision they rescinded in 1962). To avoid integration for as long as possible, the school board introduced token desegregation in 1959. Black or white students could choose to go to any school of their choice. Starting 1962, a few black students started to transfer to white schools. Not one white student ever transferred over to a black school. In 1967, Loudoun County was still operating a dual school system, with hundreds of black students remaining at the four black schools, George W. Carver, Banneker, Douglass Elementary, and Douglass High. A federal judge ordered Loudoun County to integrate its schools by the 1968-69 school year. The last graduation at Douglass High School was in May 1968. Complete integration finally came the following school year, 14 years after the Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case.

   For many decades, Loudoun’s population had remained consistent, but big changes were on the way. 1962 marked both the opening of Dulles International Airport and the creation of Sterling Park, the first planned living community in Loudoun County. These led to Loudoun’s first major population boom. No longer was consolidation possible; many new schools were needed. Loudoun County High School had already begun to feel overcrowded, so Loudoun Valley High School opened in 1962, which served the entire western half of the county’s high school population until 2010. With much of the growth happening in the east, Broad Run and Park View High Schools opened by the end of the 70’s. A few different new school design concepts were tested, including the round school design at Hillsboro and Catoctin Elementary Schools.

   Superintendent Bussinger shortly left after the integration of schools. His successor, Robert E. Butt, experienced a much more peaceful tenure than his predecessors. Loudoun’s population continued to grow into the 70’s. In 1971, LCPS inaugurated its middle school level, grades 6 through 8, with the opening of Blue Ridge and Sterling Middle Schools. The 70’s also ushered in the opening of the Charles S. Monroe Technology Center, the school system’s consolidated vocational school.

   While new schools were being built, LCPS retired some of its older fleet of schools. Some, like Bluemont and Purcellville Schools, were acquired by the newly formed County Parks and Recreation department and converted into community centers. Other schools, such as the former Leesburg High School and Douglass Elementary, were reused as administrative support facilities for the school system.

   A short recession in the 80’s put housing construction on hold. The population fell during this time, so no new schools were needed or built. Superintendent Butt retired in 1988, and was replaced by David N Thomas. Thomas held one of the shortest times in office at less than three years. Edgar B. Hatrick III, a Loudoun County High School graduate and already a 24 year LCPS employee, became the current superintendent in 1991.

   With the help of low interest rates and the new Dulles Toll Road, the housing market blossomed again in the 90’s, drawing hordes of people to Loudoun. The county was faced with unprecedented growth. Whereas in the 80’s school enrollment stayed between 12,000 and 13,000 students, by 1998 school enrollment had doubled to 26,000. By 2007, school enrollment had doubled from that to 54,000 students. New elementary schools swelled from 70,000 to 100,000 square feet during this time. Middle schools and High Schools took in similar growths. There were many years in a row in which 3-5 new schools opened each year. From 1995 to 2012, 51 schools were built and opened.

   With new schools came the reorganization of administrative space. Administrative departments were scattered around the county in cramped former schools. Since the late 80’s, the school system had tried to get a new consolidated admin building in the budget so everything would be located under one roof. They finally succeeded in 2005 with the opening of the new five-story Administration Building in Ashburn.

   New schools also gave the school district an opportunity to become more energy efficient. 1992 marked the beginning of the school system’s formal energy conservation program. They became Energy Star Partners in 1998 and have since been named Energy Star Partner of the Year for several years. Many schools, new and old, have been praised for their energy excellence. Over 50 million dollars (and counting!) have been saved.

   Today, Loudoun County continues to be one of the fastest growing counties in the nation. Over 68,000 students come to school every day, with an average of 2,800 new students enrolling each year. New elementary schools and middle schools are now two stories with a larger capacity and less strain on their school sites. As of the 2012 school year, LCPS operates and maintains 82 school facilities and 8 support facilities.

   From the school system’s humble beginnings, to the superpower industry leader that it has become today, Loudoun County Public Schools has taken a very dynamic journey. Its schools, ranging in age from the newly-opened to over 100 years at Middleburg Elementary, will continue to meet the demands of its growing population. It will continue to change, continue to evolve, and continue to inspire. But above all else, today’s schools will continue to educate tomorrow’s leaders upon the foundations that were first laid out in 1870.

Frederick Douglass Elementary School in Leesburg, VA

Saturday, June 16, 2018

Sterling Community Center Annex - 2018 Update

Sterling Annex, 2018

[Update August 2023: This school has now been demolished. Check out Sterling Annex DEMO DAY 1]

It's 2018, time for my annual check-in to the Sterling Community Center Annex! There are signs the building still receives maintenance. There are also signs the building continues to be vandalized and decay. We are going to look at all of it. Let's go!

In the past year, all of the windows have been boarded up. The building looks a lot more secure than it did a year ago. The windows aren't entirely covered, however, the boards don't reach the windows' full height. The goal of boarding the building up seems to be to keep people out. This current setup allows for weather and small wall-crawling animals to still get into the building, so the building is still not entirely damage-proof.

One of the boards covering one of the front doors is not nailed on one side, so you can reach through the door's broken windows if you so chose to. I wouldn't, there's broken glass around the edges.

The biggest news is one of the columns is no longer attached to the building and is laying on the front steps. Did it fall naturally, or was it vandalism? Luckily, it is still in one piece, so it could be put back up or stored inside for safe keeping.

The front door of Sterling Annex, with the fallen column

The backside of the column and a water downspout. Based on
the supports in the column, the downspout was not hiding
inside the column.

Some cursive inside the column, most likely from the builder.

Inside the column capital, still on the facade.

On the back of the school, the sides of the auditorium vary in plant overgrowth.

South-west side of the back of the building

South-east side of the back of the building

The basement stairs are still flooded. We have had a lot of rain recently, but this looks like the water level is in the same spot it was last year. Gross.



My favorite door, finally all boarded up, also has more of the gutter coming down:

Roof tiles are scattered everywhere.

Some miscellaneous/noteworthy vandalism around the outside:

Dents in the brick

Deep thoughts on the auditorium back door

Something I have mostly overlooked writing about thus far is the playground. There had been a playground on the site from the building's community center daus. Last year, I snapped a picture of it, still there. It's grounds had been completely taken over by grass.

Sterling Annex Playground, 2017

This past year, it was finally taken away.

Site of Sterling Annex Playground, 2018

Its removal was probably for the best. With broken glass and who knows what else, it's not a safe area for children to visit. Playgrounds can also be used as meeting places for older groups. Getting rid of it took away that space.

Plenty of planes pass overhead, Dulles Airport is nearby

There has been no recent news about any plans for the Annex building. I have reached out to Belfort Furniture on two separate occasions this past year to try to learn what they plan to do with the building. At the time of this posting, there has been no response to either.

Sterling Community Center Annex continues to be in a state of limbo. Nothing is happening with it, yet it is still here. Every year I am more sad to walk by, but I cannot look away.

Sterling Annex, 2018

Thursday, October 5, 2017

Windows Without Business Integrity - Loudoun County High School

Loudoun County Public Schools' Admin Building, Summer 2011

I have not been just ranting to the internet about the windows. Throughout the summer, I was contacting Loudoun County Public Schools about it too, in a mission to learn more and discuss the changes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 27, 2017:

Dear Dr. Michelle Luttrell, Mr. Tom Marshall, Mrs. Jill Turgeon, Mr. Eric DeKenipp, Mrs. Beth Huck, & Dr. Eric Williams,

Hello, my name is A.J. Jelonek. I was a student at Evergreen Elementary School, J. Lupton Simpson Middle School, and Loudoun County High School. I also wrote the history of LCHS. I now come to you as a concerned citizen. I recently visited LCHS to view its current renovation. I was appalled by the new window design on the front of the building.

The windows in question are on the façade’s extensions past the Georgian style central section. These windows were originally a 1950’s modern style. Although modified in the 70’s, they have mostly stayed the same style. The new windows that are being added match the Georgian section’s style. The front section’s windows will now be all architecturally unified, but they never were supposed to be, nor should they.

Please do not misunderstand: I am all for modern, energy-efficient windows. I know the former windows were terrible at keeping heat in and the cold out. But the new window design chosen does not reflect the original builder’s design. The front of Loudoun County High School is its defining feature. With these windows, the iconic façade of this 62-year-old historic building has been compromised and damaged. This is akin to taking an 18th century building from Williamsburg or Yorktown, and dumbing it down to a Busch Gardens level of historic accuracy.

Was a historical consultant hired for this project? That should be a given when any of your older school buildings undergo a renovation.

As a product of LCPS, I have seen the incredible work that can be accomplished by its teachers and staff. I have seen renovations and construction projects that keep historic integrity while modernizing (LCHS’s 2005 renovation, and the exhibit at the new Frederick Douglass ES). I do hold LCPS to a higher level – because I know you can reach it and do your best while doing so.

I would love to now open a dialogue and hear your thoughts regarding the window update.

Thank you for your time,
A.J. Jelonek


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My note was forwarded on to LCPS's Department of Support Services. I was told an official response would take some time, understandably, as summer was their busiest time with school renovations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 21, 2017:

A.J.
Thank you for your interest in our facility renovations. Please know that we are very proud of our facilities and are constantly active in maintaining our buildings and grounds in a manner in which facilitates the best educational opportunities for all our students. We have an extensive inventory of campuses and have a long history of modernizing our facilities with respect to student enrollment, programmatic offerings and code compliance. The most recent window replacement project is part of a history of renovations to the Loudoun County High School Facility. I have provided an attachment illustrating the numerous projects that have occurred in the past several decades that not only improved the service of the building to the citizens of Loudoun County but also significantly changed the building’s function and appearance. This can be said of almost all of our older facilities. Another attachment is a presentation provided to the public in our recent renovation, demolition and expansion of the facility in 2006 which includes numerous significant aesthetic and structural changes to the building. This particular window project is an example of providing improved energy conservation as well taking the opportunity to architecturally unify the whole elevation by providing a consistent style of windows throughout the façade. This is also consistent with the architectural style of this and other school structures as evidenced in the other attached exhibits.

Again, thanks for your interest in our school modernization program.

Kevin L. Lewis, PE


CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING:
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Likewise, this message may contain Federal and state governmental documents which are confidential, and the information contained therein may not be disclosed pursuant to applicable Federal and state law. If it is necessary to save this message it should only be saved to a server hard drive and not to any portable saving devices (i.e. laptop, flash drive, disks, etc.). If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and forward this original message to us at the sending address.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The attachments were:
  • A LCHS facilities history report, circa 2014. This was to emphasize that the building had changed from its original design, and that change happens. The list had varying degrees of detail, and left off numerous renovations.
  • A powerpoint presentation "2008 Exhibition of School Planning and Architecture: Loudoun County High School" on the 2005/06 school renovation. The powerpoint was meant to show again how extensive changes had already happened at the school, like the entire original back section being demolished, the Sky Bridge, or converting the original gym into the library. Thoughts:
    • This is the same powerpoint I quoted in Windows Without Historic Integrity. It's interesting this document was chosen, because it has many slides on how many original design features were painstakingly restored, replicated, and integrated into the end product. 
    • There is a clear difference in importance between the front of the school and the back of the school. The front of the school -- the front door, the "wow" factor. The back of the school -- technical shop classrooms, looks like most of the rest of the school. Change is inevitable, change can be good (i.e. the Sky Bridge), but at the same time we maintain key important aspects that make a place special. The front of the school is definitely something that should be maintained. 
  • 4 pictures of schools with Georgian architecture taken from the internet, to show what Georgian buildings look like. Which are not relevant to the discussion, because LCHS was designed with two different architecture styles present. But if you knew that in the first place, you wouldn't have decided to put Georgian windows on the end sections.

To be frank, the response and attachments made it very clear they had only glanced at what I had written and put together their response from that. Points they brought up had already been addressed in my original correspondence, while other things were completely ignored. It was difficult to write a response that was not a cut-and-paste of my original letter. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 28, 2017:

Dear Kevin Lewis (and others),

Thank you for your response, as well as the attachments. I downloaded the 2008 LCHS presentation back when it was still available on your website, it's a great resource.

I apologize if I was not clear in my original message. As I did state, I am all for energy-efficient windows, and I know how badly those classrooms needed them. I would like to know why the new windows' designs do not mimic the design of the front facade windows that originally were placed in those openings in 1954?

In regards to the 2008 presentation you sent, could you please respond to why in this 2017 renovation there was not the same push for preservation and replication of original front-facing design features as was present in the 2005/2006 renovation (as evidenced on pages 4 and 17)?

Can you please respond to my statement from my original message regarding how the front facade was never intended to be architecturally unified? Unlike the pictures of Georgian buildings you sent, LCHS's front facade was originally designed and built to have two distinct architectural styles, Georgian and 1950's Modern. It actually tells a subtle narrative, which I have written about here.

Can you please respond to my question from my original message asking if a historic consultant was hired to be a part of this renovation project?

If you would like to reread my original message I sent, since I make much reference to it, I have copied my letter below for your ease.

Again, I appreciate your time and effort towards responding,

- A.J. Jelonek

PS: I know you have a lot of schools to keep track of, but I noticed your LCHS Facility History List PDF is missing the 2009 roof molding/gutter renovation, the 2010 cupola renovation, the recent addition of the access ramps to the front of the school, the 1976 window/cupola renovation, the c. 1990's adding A/C to the main building, and the addition of the elevator to the 1966 2-story business wing section, among others.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I received no response from this. A few weeks later, I send a follow-up asking if this would be responded to.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 19, 2017:

A.J.
A quick note to follow up. I appreciate your interest in the project and please know that I assigned a number of staff members and asked consultants to contribute to the response to your initial inquiry. As such, we believe we have addressed you questions. Again, thank you for your interest in our capital program.
Kevin


CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING:
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Likewise, this message may contain Federal and state governmental documents which are confidential, and the information contained therein may not be disclosed pursuant to applicable Federal and state law. If it is necessary to save this message it should only be saved to a server hard drive and not to any portable saving devices (i.e. laptop, flash drive, disks, etc.). If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and forward this original message to us at the sending address.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 21, 2017:

I am disappointed.

-A.J.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There was a lot I was disappointed about, but I didn't feel like airing all that out would do anything. They also wanted to be done with the conversation anyway.

Things learned from the whole conversation: They didn't hire a historic consultant. They chose the windows design to architecturally unify the front of the school.


And that is where this section of the saga ends. Is it the final end? No. 



Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Windows Without Visual Integrity - Loudoun County High School

Introducing the new 2017 Loudoun County High School look.
(Also note missing snowbirds)

As of August 24, school is back in session at Loudoun County High School. The windows renovation has been completed, and the front of the school is back open. It's time to look at how all the new windows look together on the front facade.

By making the windows similar to the Georgian section's, you can now pick out a lot more detail and differences between the windows.

New 2017 (left), and Old (2005/2006 replication of 1954
windows). 

The width difference was always apparent between the two style windows. With these similar-looking Georgian windows, you can also see there was also a height difference. The Georgian section's windows were longer than the 1950's section. Having two differently-styled windows masked that.

There's also a difference of width of brick space between each window. In the Georgian Section, there's a brick width of almost 3 bricks. In the 1950's section, the brick width is two bricks.

Even the window sill is a different height in each section (Georgian: 2 bricks high; 1950's: 1 1/2 bricks high). If the Georgian and 1950's sections were originally supposed to have the same windows, shouldn't their dimensions have matched?

Dimensions aside, the new window muntins (the white grid) are of a different scale and rate from the Georgian section's. The Georgian section's are rectangular, tall and thin, while the new windows are perfectly square. If one more vertical muntin could have been added to the new windows, it might fit in better with the Georgian section's windows.

Picture from early August 2017

What really bothers me is how blocky these new windows look. You know when you stack four Lego windows together to make a mega-window in the house you're creating? That is exactly what these windows are doing. They are four separate windows grouped together. Because they are each separate window entities, they have their own frames, which creates the thick white "plus" symbol in each mega-window. It gives each window this light cartoony look.

1950's section c. 2010. The vents along the bottom row are
on the windows third from the left and second from the right. 

A feature I did not notice before in the 1950's section windows were the periodic vent openings. These vents were not original to the building (the original vent openings are in-between and below the window lines). These vent openings had been placed on the covered-over window section, so they did not stand out on the former windows.

Is it winking, or does it have a lazy eye?

With the 2017 windows, the vent openings were left exactly where they were. Because the windows are now full height, these vents take out some of the window and stick out like a sore thumb. It ruins the line of the windows. You look down the line, and then you stop and wonder why the pattern was briefly disrupted. Why can't those vent openings be routed somewhere else?? The vent opening was put in those locations because, I theorize, there was no window there at the time and it would have been cheaper than going through brick. Now that the windows are at full height, this feature should have been reconsidered. If you are trying to architecturally unify a facade, you don't want to disrupt your main pattern. These vent openings should have been moved.

The windows can open!

One design feature I do like is that these windows can still be opened. That caught me by surprise. These windows didn't have a screen on them, so they didn't look like they were made to be opened. But this also points out yet another difference in window designs. These windows angle outwards to open, while the Georgian section windows move up and down.


As my first post said, there was so much work and effort that went into replicating the look of the original Georgian windows when they were replaced in 2005/2006. It is baffling to me that the same energy did not go into trying to match these new windows with the older ones. It doesn't look cohesive. It achieves its goal the same way that red delicious and granny smith apples are similar -- they're still apples.

What this all boils down to is that these new windows did not succeed in architecturally unifying the facade. They only seem to help highlight all the differences. There are still two different window designs on the front of this building.


LCHS Windows Saga:
Windows Without Historic Integrity - Loudoun County High School
Windows Without Narrative Integrity - Loudoun County High School
Windows Without Business Integrity - Loudoun County High School

Enjoy other LCHS Articles from the same author: